Teachers' perceptions of internal factors associated with holistic learning in secondary education

Authors

  • Pedro Abdul Pinto Niño Universidad Metropolitana de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología - UMECIT, Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64325/IJIP.v3i1.28

Keywords:

holistic learning, teacher perception, secondary education, internal factors, cognitive development, socio-emotional development

Abstract

Comprehensive learning in secondary education encompasses cognitive, socio-affective, physiological, and personal components that influence the school experience. The objective of this study was to characterize these internal factors according to the perceptions of teachers affiliated with educational institutions in Bucaramanga, Colombia. A quantitative, descriptive, non-experimental, cross-sectional, and field study was conducted. One hundred teachers participated, selected through a census of the accessible population. Data was collected using a closed-ended questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale; for this article, 12 items grouped into four indicators were analyzed. Means, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation were calculated. The dimension obtained an overall mean of 3.92, a standard deviation of 0.98, and a coefficient of variation of 25.00%, corresponding to a high level. Personality and maturity presented the highest mean (3.97), followed by the cognitive component (3.94), socio-affective component (3.89), and physiological component (3.88). The difference between the means was small, indicating similar teacher evaluations. It can be concluded that participants favorably recognize all four components; however, the results reflect teacher perceptions and not direct measurements of student characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ausubel, D. P. (2002). Adquisición y retención del conocimiento: Una perspectiva cognitiva. Paidós.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Goleman, D. (2000). La inteligencia emocional: Por qué es más importante que el cociente intelectual. Javier Vergara Editor.

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Ley 115 de 1994. Ley General de Educación. Diario Oficial No. 41.214. https://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0115_1994.html

Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? En P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3–31). Basic Books.

Meneses, J. (2016). El cuestionario. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2010). Orientaciones pedagógicas para la educación artística en básica y media. República de Colombia.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2022). Orientaciones curriculares para la educación artística y cultural en educación básica y media. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1780/articles-411706_recurso_2.pdf

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Viking Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

UNESCO. (2024). UNESCO framework for culture and arts education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000395719

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pinto Niño, P. A. (2026). Teachers’ perceptions of internal factors associated with holistic learning in secondary education. International Journal of Innovation and Pedagogy, 3(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.64325/IJIP.v3i1.28